A Systematic Review of Theories on Family Business Internationalization

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Entrepreneurship, Department of New Venture Creation, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: Jfarsi@ut.ac.ir.

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of New Venture Creation, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: poormesgari@ut.ac.ir.

Abstract

Objective: Due to globalization, its economic impacts, and the capacity of family businesses to create socio-emotional value on an international scale, this study aims to establish a comprehensive theoretical framework for the internationalization of family businesses.

Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, 1,727 articles from the Web of Science database were identified over a decade, and 42 relevant theories were systematically reviewed. A subsequent narrative review further examines these theories in the context of family business internationalization.

Results: These theories are categorized through two approaches: first, a multidisciplinary approach, which includes general management theories, internationalization theories, and family business-specific frameworks; and second, an interdisciplinary approach, organizing these theories within the framework of theoretical evolution. This evolutionary process starts with theory building, continues with theory development, and concludes with theory testing.

Conclusions: The primary contribution of this study is the identification of core assumptions within each theory related to family business internationalization. Additionally, by extracting key concepts based on content correlation, this research presents a conceptual model that enhances understanding of the theoretical framework and highlights gaps in the evolution of these theories. These findings provide a valuable foundation for future research in the dynamic and evolving field of family business internationalization.

Keywords

References

  1. Kano L, Verbeke A. Family firm internationalization: Heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias. Global Strategy Journal. 2018;8(1):158-83.
  2. Arregle JL, Duran P, Hitt MA, van Essen M. Why Is Family Firms' Internationalization Unique? A Meta-Analysis. Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(5):801-31.
  3. Pongelli C, Caroli MG, Cucculelli M. Family business going abroad: the effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions. Small Bus Econ Group. 2016;47(3):787-801.
  4. Pukall TJ, Calabro A. The Internationalization of Family Firms A Critical Review and Integrative Model. Family Business Review. 2014;27(2):103-25.
  5. Hitt MA, Schwens C. The chrono level.
  6. Debellis F, Rondi E, Plakoyiannaki E, De Massis A. Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda. J World Bus. 2021;56(1):17.
  7. Alayo M, Iturralde T, Maseda A, Aparicio G. Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review. Rev Manag Sci. 2021;15(6):1517-60.
  8. Xiao Y, Watson M. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of planning education and research. 2019;39(1):93-112.
  9. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. Bmj. 2015;349.
  10. Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract. 1999;23(4):19-39.
  11. Hernández-Linares R, Sarkar S, Cobo MJ. Inspecting the Achilles heel: A quantitative analysis of 50 years of family business definitions. Scientometrics. 2018;115(2):929-51.
  12. Arregle JL, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG, Very P. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of management studies. 2007;44(1):73-95.
  13. Carr C, Bateman S. International Strategy Configurations of the World's Top Family Firms. Management International Review. 2009;49(6):733-58.
  14. Alayo M, Maseda A, Iturralde T, Arzubiaga U. Internationalization and entrepreneurial orientation of family SMEs: The influence of the family character. Int Bus Rev. 2019;28(1):48-59.
  15. Okoroafo SC. Internationalization of family businesses: Evidence from Northwest Ohio, USA. Family Business Review. 1999;12(2):147-58.
  16. Davis PS, Harveston PD. Internationalization and Organizational Growth: The Impact of Internet Usage and Technology Involvement Among Entrepreneur-led Family Businesses. Family Business Review. 200
  17. Zahra SA. International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18(4):495-512.
  18. Salvato C, Chirico F, Melin L, Seidl D. Coupling family business research with organization studies: Interpretations, issues and insights. Organ Stud. 2019;40(6):775-91.
  19. Swinth RL, Vinton KL. Do family-owned businesses have a strategic advantage in international joint ventures? Family Business Review. 1993;6(1):19-30.
  20. Araya-Castillo L, Hernandez-Perlines F, Millan-Toledo C, Cisneros MAI. Bibliometric analysis of studies on family firms. Ekon Istraz.23.
  21. Johanson J, Wiedersheimpaul F. INTERNATIONALIZATION OF FIRM - 4 SWEDISH CASES. Journal of Management Studies. 1975;12(3):305-22.
  22. Hennart JF. A theoretical assessment of the empirical literature on the impact of multinationality on performance. Global Strategy Journal. 2011;1(1‐2):135-51.
  23. Gallo MA, Pont CG. Important factors in family business internationalization. Family Business Review. 1996;9(1):45-59.
  24. Thukral S, Jain A. Unveiling contemporary dimensions in the internationalisation of family firms through bibliometric analysis and thematic analysis. Review of International Business and Strategy. 2021;31(4):507-39.
  25. Arregle JL, Chirico F, Kano L, Kundu SK, Majocchi A, Schulze WS. Family firm internationalization: Past research and an agenda for the future. J Int Bus Stud. 2021;52(6):1159-98.
  26. Miroshnychenko I, De Massis A. Sustainability practices of family and nonfamily firms: A worldwide study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;174:13.
  27. Stadler C, Mayer MC, Hautz J, Matzler K. International and product diversification: Which strategy suits family managers? Global Strategy Journal. 2018;8(1):184-207.
  28. van Essen M, Strike VM, Carney M, Sapp S. The Resilient Family Firm: Stakeholder Outcomes and Institutional Effects. Corporate Governance-an International Review. 2015;23(3):167-83.
  29. Graves C, Shan YG. An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Internationalization on the Performance of Unlisted Family and Nonfamily Firms in Australia. Family Business Review. 2014;27(2):142-60.
  30. Hsu C-H, Kao M-S, Lee L-M. The value of internationalization for emerging market firms–Family versus non-family firms. Economics Bulletin. 2016;36(2):1214-22.
  31. Tsao SM, Lien WH. Family Management and Internationalization: The Impact on Firm Performance and Innovation. Management International Review. 2013;53(2):189-213.
  32. Fernández Moya M. A family-owned publishing multinational: The Salvat company (1869–1988). Business History. 2010;52(3):453-70.
  33. Perez PF, Puig N. Global lobbies for a global economy: The creation of the Spanish Institute of Family Firms in international perspective. Business History. 2009;51(5):712-33.
  34. Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes KT, Núñez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJ, Moyano-Fuentes J. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative science quarterly. 2007;52(1):106-37.
  35. Berrone P, Cruz C, Gomez-Mejia LR. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family business review. 2012;25(3):258-79.
  36. Block J, Thurik R, van der Zwan P, Walter S. Business Takeover or New Venture? Individual and Environmental Determinants From a Cross-Country Study. Entrep Theory Pract. 2013;37(5):1099-121.
  37. Chung C-N, Luo X. Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organ Sci. 2008;19(5):766-84.
  38. Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN, Buchholtz AK. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organ Sci. 2001;12(2):99-116.
  39. Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrep Theory Pract. 2005;29(5):555-75.
  40. Woodman JM. Agency theory, behavioral agency model & stewardship theory and their relationship with succession in family firms: A literature review. Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. 2017.
  41. Martin GP, Gomez-Mejia LR, Wiseman RM. Executive stock options as mixed gambles: Revisiting the behavioral agency model. Acad Manage J. 2013;56(2):451-72.
  42. Lim EN, Lubatkin MH, Wiseman RM. A family firm variant of the behavioral agency theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 2010;4(3):197-211.
  43. Soleimanof S, Rutherford MW, Webb JW. The intersection of family firms and institutional contexts: A review and agenda for future research. Family Business Review. 2018;31(1):32-53.
  44. Ilhan-Nas T, Okan T, Tatoglu E, Demirbag M, Wood G, Glaister KW. Board composition, family ownership, institutional distance and the foreign equity ownership strategies of Turkish MNEs. J World Bus. 2018;53(6):862-79.
  45. Debellis F, Rondi E, Plakoyiannaki E, De Massis A. Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda. Journal of World Business. 2020:101144.
  46. Claver E, Rienda L, Quer D. Family Firms' International Commitment The Influence of Family-Related Factors. Family Business Review. 2009;22(2):125-35.
  47. Fernández Z, Nieto MJ. Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: Some influential factors. Family business review. 2005;18(1):77-89.
  48. Mitter C, Duller C, Feldbauer-Durstmuller B, Kraus S. Internationalization of family firms: the effect of ownership and governance. Rev Manag Sci. 2014;8(1):1-28.
  49. Fernández Z, Nieto MJ. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. J Int Bus Stud. 2006;37(3):340-51.
  50. Kontinen T, Ojala A. Internationalization pathways of family SMEs: psychic distance as a focal point. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2010;17(3):437-+.
  51. Lumpkin GT, Brigham KH, Moss TW. Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship & regional development. 2010;22(3-4):241-64.
  52. Barney JB. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. J Manag. 2001;27(6):643-50.
  53. Barney JB, Clark DN. Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage: OUP Oxford; 2007.
  54. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag. 1991;17(1):99-120.
  55. Johanson J, Vahlne JE. INTERNATIONALIZATION PROCESS OF FIRM - MODEL OF KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND INCREASING FOREIGN MARKET COMMITMENTS. J Int Bus Stud. 1977;8(1):23-32.
  56. Johanson J, Vahlne JE. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud. 2009;40(9):1411-31.
  57. Vahlne J-E, Johanson J. From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years. J Int Bus Stud. 2017;48(9):1087-102.
  58. Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I. Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family business review. 2006;19(1):73-87.
  59. Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW. Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of business venturing. 2007;22(4):545-65.
  60. David RJ, Han SK. A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strateg Manage J. 2004;25(1):39-58.
  61. Verbeke A, Yuan WL, Kano L. A values-based analysis of bifurcation bias and its impact on family firm internationalization. Asia Pac J Manag. 2020;37(2):449-77.
  62. O'Reilly III CA, Tushman ML. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad Manag Perspect. 2013;27(4):324-38.
  63. Duncan RB. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization. 1976;1(1):167-88.
  64. Dolz C, Iborra M, Safon V. Improving the likelihood of SME survival during financial and economic crises: The importance of TMTs and family ownership for ambidexterity. Brq-Business Research Quarterly. 2019;22(2):119-36.
  65. Reuber AR. An Assemblage-Theoretic Perspective on the Internationalization Processes of Family Firms. Entrep Theory Pract. 2016;40(6):1269-86.
  66. Chrisman JJ, Patel PC. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(4):976-97.
  67. Knudsen T, Madsen TK. Export strategy:: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2002;18(4):475-502.
  68. Graves C, Thomas J. Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective. Family Business Review. 2006;19(3):207-24.
  69. Fernandez Z, Nieto MJ. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. J Int Bus Stud. 2006;37(3):340-51.
  70. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP. Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrep Theory Pract. 2005;29(5):540.
  71. Kampouri K, Plakoyiannaki E, Leppaaho T. Family business internationalisation and networks: emerging pathways. J Bus Ind Mark. 2017;32(3):357-70.
  72. Graves C, Thomas J. Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review. 2008;21(2):151-67.
  73. Zahra SA. Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion. Small Bus Econ 2012;38(1):51-65.
  74. Greve HR. A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad Manage J. 2008;51(3):476-94.
  75. Fang HC, Memili E, Chrisman JJ, Tang L. Narrow‐framing and risk preferences in family and non‐family firms. Journal of Management Studies. 2021;58(1):201-35.
  76. Sharma P, Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Steier LP. Family firm behavior from a psychological perspective. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2020. p. 3-19.
  77. Panicker VS, Upadhyayula RS. Limiting role of resource dependence: an examination of director interlocks, board meetings and family ownership. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2021;28(2):424-51.
  78. Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Astrachan JH, Pieper TM. Family Involvement in the Board of Directors: Effects on Sales Internationalization. J Small Bus Manag. 2013;51(1):83-99.
  79. Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Steier LP. An introduction to theories of family business. Elsevier; 2003. p. 441-8.
  80. Hambrick DC, Mason PA. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manage Rev. 1984;9(2):193-206.
International Journal of Business and Development Studies
Volume 16, Issue 2
December 2024
Pages 71-101

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics